There is, I’ve come to realise, a certain type of hypocrisy that occurs when eloquent, successful practitioners of reflexive self-defence neglect to consider the consistency of their arguments. It’s a tactic which relies in large part on those arguments not being written down or otherwise recorded: it’s much harder to establish that your interlocutor is contradicting a prior claim if they’ve never made it to your face, or if no handy verbatim record exists, and especially if they deny ever having said it. Your memory must be to blame, or else your comprehension: either way, they’re in the right, and will doubtless continue to be so.
Unless, of course, a transcript is produced.
Lionel Shriver is not an author whose books I’ve ever read for the same reason that I’ve never subjected myself toJonathan Franzen: thewoes of modern day, middle class white people is a genre in which I have…
View original post 3,004 more words